Chapter 30
Tuesday, November 20th, 2007FOR EVEN THE IDEA that liberals undermined the fabric of the country was hatched in a think tank somewhere. The pillars of its argument laid out dispassionately in statistics and pointed studies. Its conclusion held up as “proof” by the radio hosts whose outrage and sound bites listeners could understand. And could repeat.
Between the think tanks and AM radio, not only did the tone of political discourse shift rightward in the country but the facts did too.
Taken together, the change was so gradual, so sure, so complete, it went almost unnoticed.
But it didn’t stop there, affecting only current events.
Oh, no. In order for the new view of things in America to make total sense, history had to be brought in line, too. So the events of the past were so arranged in a new kind of order that helped explain everything happening today. And a disbeliever in a dormitory in North Carolina said:
“I can’t believe you people are now trying to paint Nixon as “flawed.” He was criminal.”
“Nixon was a foreign policy genius,” said another voice.
“He was a paranoid freak.”
“He reopened ties with China.”
“He invaded Cambodia.”
“He established détente with the Soviet Union.”
“He invaded Laos.”
“So he was flawed.”
“He kept enemies lists and authorized crimes against them.”
“Everyone has their own opinion of him.”
“This stuff really happened.”
“How do you know?”
“Everyone knows. It’s history.”
“Were you there? Did you see it happen?”
“These things happened. It’s history. How can you—“
“A post-modern history, maybe. Taken from the liberal press.”
“No, really, it’s history.”
“It’s your opinion. And my opinion is that Nixon was a genius.”
![]()
Rush bellowed, and his listeners screeched back into their phones. Rush’s imitators hollered and their listeners growled. Because knowing things was fun. Being right was fun. In a truck, cruising the rolling fields and hills of Virginia:
“Why does the liberal press always protect their own?”
“They didn’t seem to be protecting Clinton much these days,” said another voice.
“Oh, they only reveal a tenth of his crimes.”
“Really?”
“The media always goes easy on the Democrats.”
“Like they did on Carter?”
“Carter had it coming.”
“Like they did on LBJ?”
“That was Vietnam. And everyone knows liberals don’t have the stomach for war.”
“That’s why FDR was reelected twice during WWII?”
“He’s not like a liberal today.”
“He created the New Deal.”
“So you say.”
“No, really. Other people say too.”
“Sure, the liberal professors cover for him. All I know is that the liberals had no stomach for Vietnam and that’s why we lost.”
“Do you even know what happened in the Vietnam War?”
“I’m sure you’re going to tell me—Know-it-all liberals can’t resist showing off—OK. Tell me your version of what happened in Vietnam.”
“It’s not my version. It really happened.”
“As if I’m going to trust a liberal to tell me what happened in Vietnam.”
“But—“
“As if a liberal would have any incentive to tell the truth.”
“—But—“
“—As if that’s even possible. As if someone can speak honestly about something they never supported.”
“—But”
“—As if people even work that way.”
![]()
Rush stood up on the turnbuckle. His rhetorical victim writhed slowly on the mat. Then Rush went flying elbow first into the jaw of liberalism! Of Clintonianism! Of feminism! And the crowd roared in ecstatic approval because winning arguments was fun. Winning was a joy.
“I don’t see why blacks vote Democrat. The Democrats keep them down,” protested a voice in Miami.
“The Democrats supported the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s,” said another.
“That’s what people say.”
“No, really. The Democrats pushed the legislation though.”
“Everyone has their own opinion.”
“It’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. LBJ signed the bill.”
“Some kind of PC fact.”
“It’s true—“
“Says the liberal media.”
“—No, really—.”
“—Told to me by a liberal. Well, let me tell you something: you liberals don’t own the media anymore and I have my own sources.”
