HATE HIPPIES? READ THIS
Thursday, July 12th, 2007My wife and I watched the 1970 classic ‘Joe’ a few weeks ago. The movie, starring Peter Boyle who was excellent and Susan Sarandon who was, well, young was set in New York in the late 1960s and directly concerned the cultural and generational clash known as the Generation Gap. Joe was a “hard hat”, an intolerant, racist, sexist, WWII veteran factory worker. Joe is in state of unceasing backlash against the liberals and hippies. He makes common cause with the ad exec father of Susan Sarandon. Both Joe and the ad exec, who oh-by-the-way bashes in the brains of his daughter’s junkie boyfriend, represent the so-called “silent majority” in two different classes. The “silent majority” was the group of fearful, law and order lovers who helped Nixon to victory in 1968. On the other side are the smug, high, lascivious flower children, who in their 19 and 20 year old arrogance, and highness, believed like millions of adolescents before them, that they were going to teach the elders how the world really worked. To me, in retrospect, it turns out the real factor driving the messianic, stoned sense of mission many hippies must have felt was simply numbers: demographically they had the squares outnumbered. And so everything must have felt possible.
What I like about this movie is that it shows neither side of society in a positive light. You cringe listening to Joe spout off hate filled invective for blacks, women, anyone. You cringe watching the hippies preach to their elders, even as they steal the cache of drugs the ad exec takes from his dead victim. And the orgy scene is enough to make anyone’s skin crawl.
Yet at a distance of 37 years, it’s hilarious too.
You feel thankful in the end that the hardhats are gone. And watching the hippies, I’m reminded of the warning that seems to come with every generation, “We’ll be lucky if society survives these sociopaths.”
I first heard that sentiment about what I guess would be Generation Y. A friend who later became a cop told me: “It’s not a matter of reforming them; it’s a matter of us surviving them.” Now as I watch the nightly news, I wonder if the most destructive generation threatening us today are the Baby Boomers. Bush is one. Osama is one. Bill was one and he sold out the Democrats just for the sport of the game. Yeah, it’s the older generation, which as I write it does make me sound like a flower child in 1968 talking about the squares.
Two things.
First, the film’s portrait of the hard hats and the flower children delineated the original fissure in American culture that would be successfully exploited by Republicans using the “Southern Strategy” for years, culminating in 2004 and crashing by 2006. Now, I wonder what will replace it. All the culture and political stake holders are in play – everyone from evangelicals to good governance people. Of course whatever replaces the hard-hard- vs. hippies divide won’t be an invention of the Republicans or Democrats alone but an emerging, intractable disagreement between the two.
Second, there is a scene where Joe and the ad exec talk about their lives and earnings. Joe asks how much the exec earns. The exec hedges. Joe tells him how many dollars an hour he makes. The exec explains that he’s paid by the year.
Joe takes another stab at it, telling the exec he has $10,000 saved and how much, he asks, does the exec have saved? The exec hesitates again saying his lifestyle costs were higher. Then, out with it, he says, $18,000.
$10,000 in 1970 would be $53,595 in 2007.
$18,000 in 1970 would be $96,471 in 2007.
And that one exchange in this gritty look at America circa 1970 said volumes about America today. Today the working class is so beleaguered, so broke and so busy, they can’t imagine the wealth of the well-to-do. And in fact, the well-to-do can’t imagine the wealth of the wealthy. In this way, the ugly portrait of America in a time of turbulence looked almost quaint.
